shabby blog
changes in latitudes header

49ers
5k fundraiser
adventures
Aidan
Ancel Keys
Aunt Sandy Uncle Dave
B.S.
bad days
bad storm
baking
basketball
be happy
beachin' it
BEAT DOOK
Becky
bestest friends in the world
BIG WIN
blessed
blogging
boot camp
Bryttava and Rob
Campbell
campbell clan
cappuccino
carbohydrates
catnip plant
challenge child
change
cheer
christmas
church
close call
Coach Harbaugh
courage
croissants
Dad
Devin
Dexter Strickland
DINKing it
do something
Doherty
Earth Day
Easter bunny
eat good food
encouragement
EPIC FAIL
evolution
family
family bakery
family origins
fat
February
FIND A CURE
fishing
Florida
flowers
football
French cafe
friends
fun
gamblin'
gardening
getting in shape
ghrelin
glucose
GO PHIL
God
good book
good cause
good food
good movie
good science/bad science
GOOFBALLS
green beer
green thumb
grief
growing up
GW
Haley
happy birfday
Happy Groundhog Day
Happy Saint Patty's Day
Harbaugh Bowl
Harrison Barnes
health
health quest
hibatchi
highs and lows
history lesson
holidays
House of Refuge
hug a tree. endangered animals
Hutchinson Island
in Roy We Trust
insulin
Ireland
Irish Royalty
Jimmy Buffett
Johnny
Jonathan
Judy
Judy and Tom
Kathy
kayaking
Kendall Marshall
Kentucky
ketones
ketosis
Kevin
kid-at-heart
laugh
Leo the cat
leptin
Lois
Lois and Steve
love
love my job
love this weather
LOVE VISITORS
lucky me
lucky to be alive
macaroons
man vs nature
margaritaville
Mediterranean diet
memories
Mexico
Michael Jordan
Michele
Mikey
mom
morning glories
my garden
my girls
Nancy
Nathaly
new home
new year's eve
new year's resolutions
Nicky
Nicole
nourishment
nutrition
oh happy day
painting
Palm Beach
paradise
Paris in Town
PBC Boot Camp
pestering
pirates
prayer
Ralph Lauren
reading
Reggie Bullock
relief
running
sailing
Scotland
seedlings
Seshie
shopping
Sigma Kappa
Singer Island
ski trip
smart mouth
snorkeling
sore muscles ouch
spring break
Square Grouper
starvation
staying in touch
Super Bowl
taking it easy
Tar Heels
terror
thank you
the calorie trap
the Emerald Isle
the ocean
the power of nature
the Sunshine State
there are good people in the world
things that matter
think about it
Thirsty Turtle
time flies
tropical
TURTLE SEASON
turtle walk
Turtlefest
turtles
Ty Lawson
Tyler Zeller
universal studios
Uptown Art Uncorked
vacation
Varsha
Varsha's African Adventure
Vero Beach
wedding planning
weight
Will
wine
winter
WPB
Showing posts with label fat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fat. Show all posts
Sunday, February 21, 2016
Ketones: Alternative Energy for Your Body
While leptin is one of the most fascinating things I learned about nutrition, ketosis is the most fascinating. It's also a bit more complicated and there's not as much solid research on it as I would like, but in my mind, it's an incredible frontier. First I'll explain the how it works, but what I find much more interesting is the why and what it means for our long-term health.
The easiest way to explain ketones is with an analogy. Fats are to ketones what carbohydrates are to glucose (i.e., carbs :: glucose = fats :: ketones). Meaning, ketones are the energy source produced by your body from digesting fat molecules whereas glucose is the energy source produced by your body from digesting carbohydrate/sugar molecules.
**Note, for simplicity's sake, I call ketone bodies "ketones" but if you're curious about the semantics go here.
If you've ever tried a low carb, high fat diet (such as Atkins), you've probably experienced what's called nutritional ketosis. Nutritional ketosis is when your body burns fat for energy instead of carbs and sugar. For reasons that may seem obvious, this is good for weight loss -- fat stores are being burned, hallelujah! But the real reason your body does this is not to make you look better in a swim suit: it relates to our body's survival mechanisms.
When a person eats carbohydrates their body stores excess energy as fat through a process called de novo lipogenesis (aka "DNL" or simply "lipogenesis" and translated from latin as "new fat creation"). This is an evolutionary advantage for humans (and other animals as well) because it allows carbohydrates to be stored as fat, which is a much more energy-dense and efficient molecule than a carbohydrate (more on this another time), and to be used for energy when food is in scarce supply. The hormone insulin plays a key role in this process by regulating and promoting the absorption of sugar/carb molecules from the blood to fat tissue and to a lesser extent skeletal muscles. Insulin also signals to brain to KEEP EATING because this delicious carbohydrate/sugar treasure trove is a food source that can be stored by the body for energy later (in the form of adipose tissue aka love handles).
Conversely, when a person eats fat, leptin plays a greater role than insulin. Leptin, also known as the "satiety hormone," tells your brain you are full. Leptin is the reason you can drink an 8 oz glass of skim milk, but not of heavy cream (or if you do, you're not hungry after drinking that full glass of heavy cream). All that fat in heavy cream is causing leptin to hold up it's stop sign to the brain. (Fun fact: heavy cream does not have any milk sugar, aka lactose, whereas skim milk is full of it).
There's another important hormone at play here: ghrelin, also known as the "hunger hormone." When your stomach is empty, ghrelin sends a message to your brain that you need to look for food. If you go without food long enough, your body switches to a "starvation response" which is a set of adaptive biochemical and physiological changes that slow your metabolism in response to a lack of food.
Your body will also fall into starvation ketosis. Starvation ketosis is when your body burns your fat stores. However, starvation ketosis operates in tandem with your body's starvation response. Your body is burning your fat stores, but doing it slowly because it wants to prolong your energy stores as long as possible since it's received news that your next meal is uncertain.
From Dr. Attia: "The reason a starving person can live for 40-60 days is precisely because we can turn fat into ketones and convert ketones into substrate for the Krebs Cycle in the mitochondria of our neurons. In fact, the more fat you have on your body, the longer you can survive. As an example of this, you may want to read this remarkable case report of a 382 day medically supervised fast (with only water and electrolytes)! If we had to rely on glucose, we’d die in a few days. If we could only rely on protein, we’d live a few more days but become completely debilitated with muscle wasting."
Dr. Attia again: "Why do we make ketones? For starters, it’s a vital evolutionary advantage. Our brain can only function with glucose and ketones. Since we can’t store more than about 24 hours worth of glucose, we would all die of hypoglycemia if ever forced to fast for more than 24 hours. Fortunately, our liver can take fat and select amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) and turn them into ketones, first and foremost to feed our brains. Hence, our body’s ability to produce ketones is required for basic survival."
As opposed to starvation ketosis, nutritional ketosis is when you are eating dietary fat and restricting carbohydrates to approximately 20-50 grams per day and maintaing modest (but not high) protein intake. When I first discovered nutritional ketosis (about two years ago now), I felt like I'd reached nutritional enlightenment. At times, I probably give ketosis too much credit, but I can say for certain that being in ketosis changed my body, my energy, and my life for the better. My experience with ketosis has been incredibly positive, perhaps that's not the case for everyone, but I also think we simply don't have enough research on the topic. Switching from a glucose-based diet to a ketogenic diet is not for the faint of heart: it requires a lot more preparation and research than simply eating bacon and butter. I hope this post was a good introduction to ketones and ketosis, but since it's fairly length already, I'll save the ins and outs of nutritional ketosis for my next post. Hopefully, this post helped get my writer's block out of the way and I can gain some momentum on this topic!
Monday, April 21, 2014
Another "Key" Piece of the Puzzle
Before I get into my planned post, I feel the need to address
something that's been in the news a lot lately. Dozens of news outlets
have picked up a story based on this publication from Cell & Metabolism
that claims low protein intake aids overall mortality rates (but only
if you are under the age of 65, some stories left that little nugget
out). I could do a lengthy post on the compromised ethics and
incompetent science that led to this conclusion, but an awesome British
nutritionist has already posted a great analysis (http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2014/03/animal-protein-as-bad-as-smoking/).
Please read her post if you have even the slightest hesitation that
this news story has even a grain of truth to it. For now, let this be a
cautionary tale in our quest for nutritional facts. It's not the first
time twisted and inaccurate data has been sensationalized by the media,
and it certainly won't be the last. In life, in love, in war, and
especially in nutrition, having a finely tuned bullshit detector is
extremely helpful.
Speaking of which... Today we are moving away from the history books and into the science texts. I'll need you guys to keep your minds open and your B.S. antennae on high. Forget everything anyone has ever told you and start from the beginning. Build the facts slowly, like a jigsaw puzzle, and soon you'll sit back in satisfaction at the full picture. Remember what we're after here? Health. Longevity. Vitality. Joy. I promise, it's worth the effort.
In my last post, I mentioned the time period in the United States when we started forming our current nutritional recommendations and guidelines. In this post, I want to get into the science behind the scenes. Instead of adopting the opinions of others, let's take a closer look at the data and the scientific opinions surrounding it and form our own interpretations and conclusions. If we think about the continuum of scientific knowledge over the centuries, humans have made scientific laws based on relatively concrete facts, until those hypotheses got disproved, revised, and/or refined. (Remember learning about Galileo? He was tried as a heretic for saying the Earth orbited the Sun.) Human beings are constantly enhancing collective societal knowledge with each generation. Therefore, questioning the current state of things isn't so heretical when you pull back and think about the fact that this is what we as humans do... we take what we know and we build on it. Sometimes we get it wrong, sometimes we get it right, but it's a process that's refined by many people over time.
Bringing this back to the present... This is where people trying to lose weight and be healthy need help. The research is so conflicting and all over the map that it takes some real sifting to get through to the facts. And there's still a lot that we cannot neatly conclude, but we are certainly making progress.
American
scientist Ancel Keys was at the forefront of the influence of diet on
health in the 1950s. He had a particular interest in the epidemiology of
cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its relationship to dietary fat. Among
many highlights in his career, he developed the CVD-lipid hypothesis.
Keys observed that the highest rates of CVD were among the most well-fed
and affluent members of society and that incidents of CVD decreased
during WWII. When he proposed the idea that fat causes CVD to a meeting of experts on heart
disease at the World Health Organization in Geneva in 1955, his
argument was swiftly dismantled. Two experts (Jacob Yerushalmy and
Herman Hilleboe—Berkeley statistician and New York State Commissioner of
Health) even went so far as to publish a chiding follow-up called "Fat
in the Diet and Mortality from Heart Disease: a Methodological Note" (no
open source, but if you have access:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13441073). Here's a highlight: “….the
evidence from 22 countries for which data are available indicates
that the association between the percentage of fat calories available
for consumption in the national diets and mortality from
arteriosclerotic and degenerative heart disease is not valid; the
association is specific neither for dietary fat nor for heart disease
mortality. Clearly this tenuous association cannot serve as much support
for the hypothesis which implicates fat as an etiologic factor in
arteriosclerotic and degenerative heart disease.”
Undeterred, Keys pushed forward with his research. His epidemiological studies, which began in 1958, lasted for decades. He gathered data on 12,000 healthy middle-aged men living in over 22 countries. He continued to observe a statistically significant association between higher intakes of saturated fats and heart disease. The problem with Keys's research is that we cannot prove causation from association. There are so many other compounding factors to this association. For instance, what other elements are involved in these individuals' diets? What other access do they have to healthcare and food? How long are they living compared to people not dying of CVD? (i.e., what is the correlation between fat and overall longevity?) How good are the cause of death records in these countries? Perhaps in countries with better records there are more cases of CVD?
Furthermore, when we look at Ancel Keys's raw data from the WHO presentation, we see a negative association between saturated fat consumption and all other deaths not from heart disease. We can also observe with high significance that those with a higher percent of calories from carbohydrates had the greatest mortality in men ages 55 to 59. In addition, overall, countries with higher average fat intake had the longest life expectancies. However, the only reason I'm presenting you with this information is to show how easily the statistics can be manipulated to prove a point. There are still many compounding factors, which is the great challenge nutritional data faces and a major reason why it's so all over the place.
I find the most compelling compounding factor for Key's research to be this (from Yerushalmy and Hilleboe): "The amount of fat and protein available for consumption is an index of a country’s development, industrially, nutritionally, medically, and no doubt in other respects as well."
In 1961, Ancel Keys was on the cover of TIME magazine for his research efforts. The food industry, and by natural domino effect, national health polices, followed suit. If you find this hard to believe, remember that industry has steered us down a dangerous path not so long ago. It was just at the end of the 20th century that our society recognized the ill-effects of smoking. Ad campaigns featuring physicians were prominent through the early 1950s, tobacco executives used the doctor image to assure the consumer that their respective brands were safe. From 1948 to 1954, Camel's advertising slogan was “More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.” There was even a school of thought that cigarettes were a health aide and were recommended to patients for reducing anxiety and stress.
Our health system is not holistic, we look at a symptom and we treat the symptom, but we don't treat the entire person and we don't focus on prevention. The other major difficulty here is that we are not dealing with a singular "BIG" as in Big Tobacco. We are dealing with Big Pharma, Big Sugar, Big Soda, Big Food, Big Alcohol... the list goes on. This is a problem that has to be solved by educating the consumer (ourselves) and making economic choices that force change.
Keys didn't get it all wrong however. He lived to the age of 100 and was a big proponent of the Mediterranean diet. I'll discuss the Mediterranean diet in more detail later, but remember two key components of this diet are olive oil and fish. He and his wife retired comfortably to a villa in Naples and they certainly weren't eating low fat sugar-laden vanilla-flavored yogurt from Aisle 9. (Side note: I doubt that Keys partook in this, but cooking with lard was a huge part of the actual diet of people living in the Mediterranean region -- you won't find that in the diet book however.)
SO... Keys is one piece of the puzzle, read up on him and his time period and you will get a much fuller picture of why our current health recommendations are what they are. If you enjoy a good drama, read about his feud with British scientist John Yudkin. However, Keys is not the whole picture. We haven't solved the mystery yet, but now we have a bit more background for our case.
Additional Sources and Further Reading:
If you don't read anything else here, read this post by Denise Minger of Raw Food SOS, she does an incredible job assembling Ancel Key's raw data and interpreting the results here: http://rawfoodsos.com/2011/12/22/the-truth-about-ancel-keys-weve-all-got-it-wrong/
http://www.epi.umn.edu/cvdepi/essay.asp?id=33
http://openheart.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000032.long
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/dietandfitness/10634081/John-Yudkin-the-man-who-tried-to-warn-us-about-sugar.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470496/
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/23/obituaries/23keys.html?_r=0
Speaking of which... Today we are moving away from the history books and into the science texts. I'll need you guys to keep your minds open and your B.S. antennae on high. Forget everything anyone has ever told you and start from the beginning. Build the facts slowly, like a jigsaw puzzle, and soon you'll sit back in satisfaction at the full picture. Remember what we're after here? Health. Longevity. Vitality. Joy. I promise, it's worth the effort.
In my last post, I mentioned the time period in the United States when we started forming our current nutritional recommendations and guidelines. In this post, I want to get into the science behind the scenes. Instead of adopting the opinions of others, let's take a closer look at the data and the scientific opinions surrounding it and form our own interpretations and conclusions. If we think about the continuum of scientific knowledge over the centuries, humans have made scientific laws based on relatively concrete facts, until those hypotheses got disproved, revised, and/or refined. (Remember learning about Galileo? He was tried as a heretic for saying the Earth orbited the Sun.) Human beings are constantly enhancing collective societal knowledge with each generation. Therefore, questioning the current state of things isn't so heretical when you pull back and think about the fact that this is what we as humans do... we take what we know and we build on it. Sometimes we get it wrong, sometimes we get it right, but it's a process that's refined by many people over time.
Bringing this back to the present... This is where people trying to lose weight and be healthy need help. The research is so conflicting and all over the map that it takes some real sifting to get through to the facts. And there's still a lot that we cannot neatly conclude, but we are certainly making progress.

Undeterred, Keys pushed forward with his research. His epidemiological studies, which began in 1958, lasted for decades. He gathered data on 12,000 healthy middle-aged men living in over 22 countries. He continued to observe a statistically significant association between higher intakes of saturated fats and heart disease. The problem with Keys's research is that we cannot prove causation from association. There are so many other compounding factors to this association. For instance, what other elements are involved in these individuals' diets? What other access do they have to healthcare and food? How long are they living compared to people not dying of CVD? (i.e., what is the correlation between fat and overall longevity?) How good are the cause of death records in these countries? Perhaps in countries with better records there are more cases of CVD?
Furthermore, when we look at Ancel Keys's raw data from the WHO presentation, we see a negative association between saturated fat consumption and all other deaths not from heart disease. We can also observe with high significance that those with a higher percent of calories from carbohydrates had the greatest mortality in men ages 55 to 59. In addition, overall, countries with higher average fat intake had the longest life expectancies. However, the only reason I'm presenting you with this information is to show how easily the statistics can be manipulated to prove a point. There are still many compounding factors, which is the great challenge nutritional data faces and a major reason why it's so all over the place.
I find the most compelling compounding factor for Key's research to be this (from Yerushalmy and Hilleboe): "The amount of fat and protein available for consumption is an index of a country’s development, industrially, nutritionally, medically, and no doubt in other respects as well."
In 1961, Ancel Keys was on the cover of TIME magazine for his research efforts. The food industry, and by natural domino effect, national health polices, followed suit. If you find this hard to believe, remember that industry has steered us down a dangerous path not so long ago. It was just at the end of the 20th century that our society recognized the ill-effects of smoking. Ad campaigns featuring physicians were prominent through the early 1950s, tobacco executives used the doctor image to assure the consumer that their respective brands were safe. From 1948 to 1954, Camel's advertising slogan was “More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.” There was even a school of thought that cigarettes were a health aide and were recommended to patients for reducing anxiety and stress.
Our health system is not holistic, we look at a symptom and we treat the symptom, but we don't treat the entire person and we don't focus on prevention. The other major difficulty here is that we are not dealing with a singular "BIG" as in Big Tobacco. We are dealing with Big Pharma, Big Sugar, Big Soda, Big Food, Big Alcohol... the list goes on. This is a problem that has to be solved by educating the consumer (ourselves) and making economic choices that force change.
Keys didn't get it all wrong however. He lived to the age of 100 and was a big proponent of the Mediterranean diet. I'll discuss the Mediterranean diet in more detail later, but remember two key components of this diet are olive oil and fish. He and his wife retired comfortably to a villa in Naples and they certainly weren't eating low fat sugar-laden vanilla-flavored yogurt from Aisle 9. (Side note: I doubt that Keys partook in this, but cooking with lard was a huge part of the actual diet of people living in the Mediterranean region -- you won't find that in the diet book however.)
SO... Keys is one piece of the puzzle, read up on him and his time period and you will get a much fuller picture of why our current health recommendations are what they are. If you enjoy a good drama, read about his feud with British scientist John Yudkin. However, Keys is not the whole picture. We haven't solved the mystery yet, but now we have a bit more background for our case.
Additional Sources and Further Reading:
If you don't read anything else here, read this post by Denise Minger of Raw Food SOS, she does an incredible job assembling Ancel Key's raw data and interpreting the results here: http://rawfoodsos.com/2011/12/22/the-truth-about-ancel-keys-weve-all-got-it-wrong/
http://www.epi.umn.edu/cvdepi/essay.asp?id=33
http://openheart.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000032.long
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/dietandfitness/10634081/John-Yudkin-the-man-who-tried-to-warn-us-about-sugar.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470496/
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/23/obituaries/23keys.html?_r=0
Labels:
Ancel Keys,
B.S.,
fat,
health quest,
Mediterranean diet
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)